🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor is likely the ideal pick for a bold scary movie about the biblical figure, however not for the reasons many viewers might assume. In reality, Cage doesn't even act as the central religious figure in the new film: the part he plays is listed merely as a craftsman. He is cast as a father figure of this story, striving to uphold his beliefs while The Boy (portrayed by the young actor), their adolescent adopted son, begins to exhibit miraculous gifts. The reason it's hard to picture a different prominent performer playing this part is that although his character grows stricken with various challenges, Nicolas Cage looks practically emotionally confident that the gloomy, bleak small film is a valuable project.

Cage's Latest Projects

Nicolas Cage has been allocating his time more judiciously recently. He still makes more films than the majority of average viewers will ever see — for instance, were you informed that the man has completed three separate cowboy movies in the past three years? — however he also adds esteemed independent films such as one recent hit, Pig, and a further title. The Carpenter’s Son seems like one of those, as it’s genre-adjacent, likely to stir debate, and handles a exaggerated concept quite seriously.

Movie's Storyline and Execution

Unfortunately, writer-director Lotfy Nathan fails to repay that serious attention. The film starts from a interestingly wandering context, positioned as inspired by an unknown scripture regarding the early years of Jesus. Cage's character, the maternal figure, and the boy travel constantly, fearful of religious persecution or suspicion about their son's unusual abilities. “Calamity follows us,” Cage gloomily remarks. That continues as evil influences target the family where they currently live, initiating on that familiar Biblical temptation for the youth.

At times, the movie mirrors an Exorcist-style horror film, but not one of the main figures are clearly inhabited. On the contrary, they are more and more distant mutually, as these forces affect a local young woman (Isla Johnston, named “The Stranger”) who the son connects to, and gives all disturbing images of a dark tomorrow. Cage's role especially struggles with his position within the plot, sometimes scolding his child who mystifies him.

Debate and Care

The content is likely to stir disagreement, and Nathan approaches it with a lot of delicacy — overly, maybe. The idea of a adolescent dealing with his eventual sacrifice and seduced by unknown powers is indeed frightening, but the filmmaker may be wary of looking exploitative and eager to telegraph his aims, so he often falls back on darkly ominous filming. Characters continually reflect — the singer-actress, who showed notable talent in a recent film update, interestingly — yields her acting to her religious attire, occasionally interrupted by several disturbing frightening scenes.

The Star's Acting and Film's Shortcomings

Meanwhile, Cage flirts with precisely the type of overacting that those who enjoy his campier roles could be expecting. One scene (also included) in promotional material where Cage loses control and screams “My faith has been shattered!” When this sort of dramatic explosion is part of a religious scary film, perhaps a more openly absurd style would make better use of Cage’s willingness to go over the top when necessary. Rather, The Carpenter’s Son is closer to the less successful low-budget films the actor filmed over the last decade — apart from the B-movies instead the narrative films and supernatural thrillers that often seem intriguing, and frequently include several notable actor's highlights, but ultimately feel like, well, low-budget DTV material.

Truthfully, a number of those, though not as grand, were easier to view overall. This is when I must disregard my personal rule, not faith-based but professional: Long ago, an admired senior convinced me to banish descriptive terms like “tedious” or “uninteresting” from my reviewing language. These words express scant except a subjective and generically described lack of patience, disengaging from the task of clearly expressing the intellectual and emotional experience of watching a specific film. It's hard to communicate tedium without appearing dull personally. It’s no more expressive as labeling a movie “engaging.” “Say more,” essentially.

But I must confess, I felt uninterested throughout the film. To the movie’s non-exploitative credit, it’s a churchy kind of boredom, not because The Carpenter’s Son is moralizing, but because it requires a kind of obedient endurance to watch it. Eventually soon after starting, the movie locks into a cyclic tempo of simmering anguish, and does not