🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about industry interference with health policies. In recent weeks, WHO officials issued a warning that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of corporate influence everywhere. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum one year after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities specifically advises a warning should cover at least half of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for multiple violations “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia states the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but claims that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We exist in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my garden and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative stated: “The company operates its operations according with applicable local laws. Moreover, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, they said, noting that underage people should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which involves rising levels of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.